Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Vipond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Vipond[edit]

Neil Vipond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 06:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 09:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 09:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No notability beyond a few minor roles on television (all of which are unsourced). By the way, the links to the stage plays (Endpapers and Rope) are links to ... you guessed it, articles on paper and rope. NewYorkActuary (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not fully satisfying the actors notability guidelines, nothing else to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 22:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.